Abstract
The results of a study aimed at analyzing and interpreting the semantic forms related to inter-transdisciplinary communication exposed in the Strategic Plans of Chilean universities are presented, problematizing the organizational conditions that enable, limit and make inter-transdisciplinary operational. In this line, strategic planning is observed as a complex process that accounts for various systemic configurations, with inter-transdisciplinarity being an emerging and multiple construction that the university generates through its own operations and in coupling with its societal environment, relieving itself inter-transdisciplinarity as a gravitating notion for the prospective of Chilean universities.
References
Arnold, M. (1998). Recursos para la Investigación Sistémico/Constructivista. Cinta De Moebio. Revista De Epistemología De Ciencias Sociales, (3). Recuperado de https://cintademoebio. uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/26454
Bendassolli, P. (2013). Theory Building in Qualitative Research: Reconsidering the Problem of Induction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.1.1851
Besio, C., y Pronzini, A. (2010). Inside Organizations and Out. Methodological Tenets for Em- pirical Research Inspired by Systems Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1539
Klippendorf, K. (1990). Metodologías de análisis de contenido. Teoría y práctica. Paidos. Luhmann, N. (2005). Organización y decisión. Autopoiésis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo. Anthropos.
Luhmann, N. (2010). Organización y decisión. Herder.
Navarro, P., y Díaz, C. (1994). Análisis de contenido. En J.M. Delgado y J. Gutiérrez (Coords.), Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en Ciencias Sociales (pp. 177-224). Síntesis Psicológica.
Seidl, D. (2005). Organization and Interaction. In D. Seidl & K. Helge Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luh- mann and Organization Studies (pp. 145-170). Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press. Stichweh, R. (2016). Estructura social y semántica: la lógica de una distinción sistémica. Re-
vista MAD, (35), 1-14. https//doi.org/10.5354/0718-0527.2016.42794
Urquiza, A., Billi, M., y Leal, T. (2017). Aplicar una distinción. Un programa sistémico-cons- tructivista para la investigación social cualitativa. Revista MAD, (37), 21-53. https://doi. org/ 10.5354/0718-0527.2017.47269

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Harold Dupuis, Rodrigo Browne, Constanza Yañez, Ivan G. Oliva
